To enter the
world of Richard Hamilton’s late works is to enter a self-contained closed
world of reflections and mirrored fragments. Endlessly self-referential, works
reappear in other works, which themselves refer back to yet other works. To
view them is to participate in a post-modern game through art history. And it
is a thoroughly enjoyable game to play.
The first works
we see are paintings where the National Gallery’s Sainsbury Wing has been
transformed into a vast cathedral, sparsely populated by female nudes and tiny
reproductions of earlier Hamilton works. These two paintings (The Saensbury Wing (1999-2000) and Charity), like many in the exhibition,
reference a painting in the National’s collection, Pieter Saenredam’s The Interior of the Grote Kerk at Haarlem
(1636-37). And with these paintings we are introduced to all of the main themes
of the exhibition: interiors, paintings in the National Gallery, the female
nude and other works of Richard Hamilton.
In Lobby (1985-87) a hotel lobby is painted
with unwavering verisimilitude, the planes within fragmented by carefully
rendered mirrored surfaces. It is a meticulously measured photo-realistic
painting. The only ‘painterly’ marks are to be found on the flowers in the
foreground and the painted paintings reflected in the two large mirrored
columns. Lobby reappears in a later
work, Hotel du Rhone (2005), where it
hangs prominently on a wall in a digitally rendered collage of a hotel room
being hoovered by a naked chambermaid. The
contents and layout of the room bring to mind Hamilton’s most celebrated image,
probably the most famous collage in art history, Just what is it that makes today's homes so
different, so appealing? (1956).
Other
than Lobby and The Saensbury Wing not many of these works could
be described simply as paintings, although Hamilton did refer to them as such.
They are mostly digital mash-ups incorporating elements of painting, collage
and photography and finally printed onto canvas.
Hamilton’s
nudes are always beautiful young women and it is in two more of these nudes
that we find the final preoccupation of this exhibition, and a major
preoccupation of Hamilton’s career. Descending Nude (2006) shows the
same woman four times, three times reflected in a mirror walking down a flight
of stairs, and the fourth facing the mirror. In The Passage of the Bride
(1998-99) the female nude is reflected in the glass of a section of Marcel
Duchamp’s The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even (1915-23),
otherwise known as The Large Glass, which is seen hanging on the wall of
another domestic interior. In the nineteen sixties Hamilton played an important
role in the rehabilitation of Duchamp’s reputation in the art world, not least
by remaking many of Duchamp’s works and bringing them to a new and wider
audience. Duchamp blessed this project, even going so far, in typically
Duchampian manner, as to sign Hamilton’s versions of his work. Another
Duchampian aspect to Hamilton’s work is the delight he takes in replicating his
own work on a smaller scale, as in Duchamp’s Box in a Valise (1935-41).
The
clumsiest aspect of Hamilton’s work on show here are the titles, bad puns and
unsubtle allusions, as if he hasn’t got the confidence in his audiences ability
to ‘get’ the references. And one or two of the works are considerably weaker
than others. I wasn’t entirely convinced by The passage of the angel to the
virgin (2007), Hamilton’s updating of a Renaissance favourite, the
Annunciation, for example. But these are minor quibbles. The exhibition is
worth a visit alone for the opportunity to view Hamilton’s last work, Le
Chef – d’oeuvre inconnu – a painting in three parts (2011 – printed 2012),
which will probably pass into Hamilton legend as his last, great, unfinished,
masterpiece.
Hamilton
was working on Le Chef… for the final eighteen months of his life and he
described it, according to this exhibitions catalogue, as his Etant Donnes.
This is a slight exaggeration. Duchamp worked on his final piece in secret for
twenty years when everyone thought he had given up art, releasing it only after
his death as a way of upsetting Duchampian scholars from being able to sum up
his life’s work into a neat little Duchampian shaped compartment. Hamilton’s
final work doesn’t really deviate from the well-trodden Hamilton path. It is a
nude, a particularly beautiful one. It references, and indeed collages, a
number of old masters. And it is a digital mash-up of photography, painting,
and collage. Based on a short story by Balzac, Le Chef… tells of a young
painter trying to paint the perfect nude, produce the epitome of beauty and desire,
but when he shows his work to a couple of other painter friends all they see is
a mess of paint except for one beautifully rendered foot.
No comments:
Post a Comment